Audited performance · HELIX v1.7 Build #58

GPU-class latency, on a CPU.

Official vLLM-project GuideLLM harness, AMD EPYC 9254 (Genoa, 256 GB DDR5), 32K context, 900 extraction prompts, up to 300 completions per concurrency tier. 640/640 requests, zero errors.

The benchmark platform is AMD EPYC — but HELIX is architecture-agnostic. It also runs on Intel (in production at UNSW), IBM Power (on the roadmap), and Apple Silicon, where it's exceptionally fast for Mac and hybrid deployments.

940ms
p50 TTFT at c=1
12.9×
faster TTFT than Ollama (c=4)
100%
valid JSON, every tier
98.5%
of FP16 accuracy at 4-bit
Primary matrix

HELIX v1.7 vs stock Ollama

SystemConc.TTFT p50TTFT p95Valid JSONTokens / req
HELIX v1.7 #58c=1940 ms1,089 ms100%~85 complete
HELIX v1.7 #58c=21,687 ms1,946 ms100%~87 complete
HELIX v1.7 #58c=42,469 ms3,053 ms100%~87 complete
Stock Ollamac=18,416 ms10,622 ms~84%~16 fragment
Stock Ollamac=216,262 ms17,088 ms~84%~16 fragment
Stock Ollamac=431,816 ms34,531 ms~84%~16 fragment

Ollama returns ~16-token fragments at 32K (full Mamba2 SSM state rebuild); HELIX returns complete schema-valid extractions. M

TTFT advantage
Conc.HELIXOllamaAdvantage
c=1940 ms8,416 ms8.95×
c=21,687 ms16,262 ms9.64×
c=42,469 ms31,816 ms12.89×
Why it holds up
  • PARALLEL_SLOTS=4. Four KV-warmed inference slots serve concurrent requests in parallel — a 6.9× c=4 TTFT improvement over single-slot builds.
  • Strict NUMA pinning. All 22 threads pinned to one CCD and its local DDR5 controllers — no cross-die Infinity Fabric traffic.
  • 100% JSON compliance. Logit-bias grammar-masked sampling constrains decoding to your schema — automated pipelines never halt.
  • Near-zero TTFT variance. TTFT mean ≈ p50 (942 ms ≈ 940 ms) — the OOM and serialization tails are eliminated.

Run the same benchmark in your environment.

Book a call for the full technical report and a sovereign HELIX pod on your hardware.